nuclear reactor: have located near water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power plant
Weight: 0.69
, technology
Weight: 0.63
, system
Weight: 0.62
Siblings plutonium
Weight: 0.65
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.40
, nuclear fission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have located near water 1.00
is near water 0.92
be located near lakes 0.92
have located 0.91
be located near lakes in georgia 0.86
be built above ground 0.75
is water 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, have located near water)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, have located)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, is near water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, be located near lakes in georgia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, be built above ground)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, is water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, is water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, is water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, is water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, have located)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, be built above ground)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, be built above ground)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, is water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, is water)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, be built above ground)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, have located near water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nuclear reactor, have located near water)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, have located near water)