nuclear reactor: is bad idea

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power plant
Weight: 0.69
, technology
Weight: 0.63
, system
Weight: 0.62
Siblings plutonium
Weight: 0.65
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.40
, nuclear fission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad idea 1.00
is idea 0.94
is thing 0.79
is same thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, is thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, is idea)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, is same thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, is thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, is idea)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, is same thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, is thing)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, is same thing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(nuclear reactor, is idea)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is idea)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is same thing)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, is bad idea)