nuclear weapon: has quality use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical weapon
Weight: 0.80
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.75
, weapon
Weight: 0.73
, missile
Weight: 0.73
, ballistic missile
Weight: 0.67
Siblings atomic bomb
Weight: 0.79
, neutron bomb
Weight: 0.72
, hydrogen bomb
Weight: 0.72
, cruise missile
Weight: 0.71
, trident
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality use 1.00
has quality good 0.88
has quality bad 0.86
has quality worth 0.81
has quality definition 0.80
has quality effects 0.78
has quality worse 0.78
has quality news 0.76
use water 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(missile, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(nuclear power plant, use water)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, use water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality effects)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(missile, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(missile, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, use water)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality effects)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(trident, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(missile, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(weapon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(nuclear power plant, use water)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(trident, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(trident, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality use)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality effects)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality effects)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, use water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(missile, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hydrogen bomb, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trident, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, use water)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality effects)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(missile, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality worse)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality good)