nuclear weapon: were needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical weapon
Weight: 0.80
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.75
, weapon
Weight: 0.73
, missile
Weight: 0.73
, ballistic missile
Weight: 0.67
Siblings atomic bomb
Weight: 0.79
, neutron bomb
Weight: 0.72
, hydrogen bomb
Weight: 0.72
, cruise missile
Weight: 0.71
, trident
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
were needed 1.00
need have 0.85
were needed in world war 2 0.84
were devoloped 0.83
need refuelled 0.83
were needed in china 0.82
were made 0.79
is necessary 0.79
is are used 0.78
need water 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(weapon, were needed in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, need refuelled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(weapon, were devoloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nuclear power plant, need water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(weapon, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(chemical weapon, is are used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(weapon, were needed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, is are used)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(weapon, were made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, need water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, need refuelled)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(weapon, were needed in world war 2)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were made)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were needed in world war 2)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were needed)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, need refuelled)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, need water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, is are used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, were made)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(weapon, were needed in world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, need refuelled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(weapon, were devoloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(weapon, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nuclear power plant, need water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(chemical weapon, is are used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(atomic bomb, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, is necessary)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(atomic bomb, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, were made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, were needed)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were devoloped)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, were devoloped)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were devoloped)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were made)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, is necessary)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, were made)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, is necessary)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were made)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were devoloped)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, is necessary)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, is necessary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, is are used)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, need water)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(weapon, were made)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(weapon, were devoloped)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, need refuelled)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed in world war 2)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(atomic bomb, were made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, is are used)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, need water)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(weapon, were made)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(weapon, were devoloped)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, need refuelled)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(nuclear weapon, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed in world war 2)