number: be closed under multiplication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real number
Weight: 0.79
, irrational number
Weight: 0.77
, social security number
Weight: 0.76
, prime number
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ordinal number
Weight: 0.77
, magic number
Weight: 0.76
, complex number
Weight: 0.75
, imaginary number
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be closed under multiplication 1.00
be closed in subtraction 0.76
be closed under addition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(real number, be closed under addition)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(number, be closed under multiplication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(real number, be closed under addition)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(real number, be closed under addition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(real number, be closed under addition)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(number, be closed under multiplication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(number, be closed under multiplication)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(number, be closed under addition)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(number, be closed under addition)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(number, be closed under addition)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(number, be closed under addition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(number, be closed under multiplication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(number, be closed under multiplication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(real number, be closed under addition)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(number, be closed under multiplication)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(real number, be closed under addition)