nunavut: have population density

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents province
Weight: 0.51
, territory
Weight: 0.47
, place
Weight: 0.44
, area
Weight: 0.39
, state
Weight: 0.33
Siblings ontario
Weight: 0.27
, free state
Weight: 0.27
, alberta
Weight: 0.27
, region
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
have population density 1.00
have low population density 0.97
have population 0.89
have smallest population 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(place, have low population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nunavut, have population density)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(place, have low population density)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(place, have low population density)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ontario, have population)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(place, have low population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(nunavut, have population density)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ontario, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ontario, have population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(nunavut, have population density)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(nunavut, have low population density)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(nunavut, have low population density)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nunavut, have population)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(nunavut, have low population density)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(nunavut, have smallest population)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(nunavut, have population)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nunavut, have low population density)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nunavut, have population)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(nunavut, have smallest population)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(nunavut, have population)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(nunavut, have smallest population)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(nunavut, have smallest population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nunavut, have population density)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nunavut, have population density)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(place, have low population density)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ontario, have population)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(nunavut, have population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(place, have low population density)