nursing: be important metaparadigm

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, occupation
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, science
Weight: 0.60
Siblings pharmacy
Weight: 0.34
, computer science
Weight: 0.33
, kennel
Weight: 0.33
, clinic
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important metaparadigm 1.00
is interesting 0.78
continue education important 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, is interesting)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is interesting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(computer science, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(computer science, is interesting)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pharmacy, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pharmacy, is interesting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(nursing, be important metaparadigm)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(nursing, is interesting)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nursing, continue education important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(nursing, is interesting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(nursing, is interesting)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(nursing, continue education important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(nursing, continue education important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(nursing, is interesting)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(nursing, continue education important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nursing, be important metaparadigm)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nursing, be important metaparadigm)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, is interesting)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nursing, be important metaparadigm)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pharmacy, is interesting)