nursing: feel good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, occupation
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, science
Weight: 0.60
Siblings pharmacy
Weight: 0.34
, computer science
Weight: 0.33
, kennel
Weight: 0.33
, clinic
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
feel good 1.00
has quality good 0.80
do want work 0.79
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nursing, feel good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(science, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nursing, feel good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(science, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(field, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(science, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(field, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kennel, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nursing, feel good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(science, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nursing, feel good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(computer science, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kennel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(kennel, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(nursing, feel good)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(nursing, do want work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(nursing, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(nursing, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nursing, do want work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(nursing, do want work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(nursing, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nursing, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(nursing, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(nursing, do want work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(nursing, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(nursing, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(nursing, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nursing, feel good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(nursing, feel good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(science, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(kennel, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(science, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(nursing, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)