nursing: is applied science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, occupation
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, science
Weight: 0.60
Siblings pharmacy
Weight: 0.34
, computer science
Weight: 0.33
, kennel
Weight: 0.33
, clinic
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is applied science 1.00
is applied 0.90
is science 0.88
be to biology 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(nursing, is applied science)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(nursing, is applied)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nursing, is science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(nursing, is applied)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(nursing, is applied)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(nursing, be to biology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(nursing, is applied)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(nursing, is science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(nursing, be to biology)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(nursing, is science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(nursing, be to biology)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nursing, is science)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nursing, be to biology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(nursing, is applied science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nursing, is applied science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(nursing, is applied science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)