nut: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.59
, source
Weight: 0.58
, magazine
Weight: 0.58
, plant
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macadamia nut
Weight: 0.81
, acorn
Weight: 0.63
, hazelnut
Weight: 0.63
, pecan
Weight: 0.62
, almond
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be good for dogs 0.97
be poisonous to dogs 0.85
be toxic to dogs 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be bad for dogs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, be bad for dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(acorn, be poisonous to dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, be toxic to dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(acorn, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(acorn, be bad for dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(macadamia nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(macadamia nut, be bad for dogs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(macadamia nut, be toxic to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(macadamia nut, be toxic to dogs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(acorn, be poisonous to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(acorn, be poisonous to dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(nut, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nut, be good for dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(nut, be good for dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(nut, be good for dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(nut, be good for dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nut, be toxic to dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(nut, be poisonous to dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(nut, be toxic to dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(nut, be poisonous to dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(nut, be toxic to dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(nut, be toxic to dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nut, be poisonous to dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nut, be poisonous to dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(nut, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(acorn, be bad for dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(acorn, be poisonous to dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, be toxic to dogs)