nut: split in half

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.59
, source
Weight: 0.58
, magazine
Weight: 0.58
, plant
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macadamia nut
Weight: 0.81
, acorn
Weight: 0.63
, hazelnut
Weight: 0.63
, pecan
Weight: 0.62
, almond
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
split in half 1.00
be in two halves 0.79
have two halves 0.79
break cleanly in half 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(almond, split in half)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(almond, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(almond, split in half)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(nut, split in half)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(nut, break cleanly in half)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(nut, break cleanly in half)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(nut, be in two halves)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(nut, break cleanly in half)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nut, break cleanly in half)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nut, be in two halves)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nut, have two halves)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(nut, have two halves)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(nut, be in two halves)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(nut, have two halves)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(nut, be in two halves)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(nut, have two halves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(nut, split in half)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nut, split in half)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(nut, split in half) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(almond, split in half)