oak: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	deciduous tree Weight: 0.74 , hardwood Weight: 0.68 , wood Weight: 0.67 , tree Weight: 0.64
Siblings	oak tree Weight: 0.42 , maple tree Weight: 0.39 , birch Weight: 0.39 , beech Weight: 0.39 , fruit tree Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
is more expensive	0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(hardwood, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(oak, is expensive)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(oak, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(hardwood, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is expensive)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(beech, is expensive)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(maple tree, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(hardwood, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(oak, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(oak, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(beech, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(beech, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(maple tree, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(maple tree, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(oak, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(oak, is more expensive)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(oak, is more expensive)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(oak, is more expensive)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(oak, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(oak, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(oak, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(hardwood, is expensive)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(hardwood, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(beech, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(maple tree, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(hardwood, is expensive)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(oak, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(hardwood, is more expensive)