obesity: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents health
Weight: 0.70
, eating disorder
Weight: 0.67
, disease
Weight: 0.63
, risk
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.62
Siblings overeating
Weight: 0.37
, bulimia
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.36
, diabetes
Weight: 0.36
, nutrition
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
good for optimal sporting 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(health, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(obesity, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(eating disorder, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(obesity, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(obesity, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(obesity, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(health, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(health, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nutrition, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(overeating, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bulimia, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nutrition, good for optimal sporting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(health, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(obesity, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(obesity, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(eating disorder, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(obesity, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(obesity, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nutrition, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nutrition, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(bulimia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(bulimia, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(overeating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(overeating, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(nutrition, good for optimal sporting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nutrition, good for optimal sporting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(obesity, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(obesity, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(obesity, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(obesity, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(obesity, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nutrition, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(overeating, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bulimia, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nutrition, good for optimal sporting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(health, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has quality bad)