observation: be crucial to scientific process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.61
Siblings experiment
Weight: 0.65
, outlier
Weight: 0.53
, hipparchus
Weight: 0.33
, evaluation
Weight: 0.33
, telescope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be crucial to scientific process 1.00
be important in scientific method 0.87
be first step in scientific method 0.84
be important in science 0.82
be important to science 0.82
relate to scientific method 0.81
be important for scientists 0.80
be needed in research 0.78
be important technique in research 0.78
be important technique in psychological research 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(practice, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(practice, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(practice, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(practice, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(experiment, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(experiment, be important in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(observation, be crucial to scientific process)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(observation, relate to scientific method)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(observation, be important in scientific method)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(observation, be first step in scientific method)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(observation, be important in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(observation, be important to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(observation, relate to scientific method)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(observation, be important for scientists)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in scientific method)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(observation, be needed in research)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(observation, be first step in scientific method)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(observation, be important in scientific method)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(observation, be first step in scientific method)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(observation, be important technique in psychological research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(observation, relate to scientific method)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(observation, be important to science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(observation, be important in science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(observation, be important to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(observation, be needed in research)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(observation, be important for scientists)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(observation, be important for scientists)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(observation, be needed in research)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(observation, be first step in scientific method)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(observation, be important technique in psychological research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(observation, be important technique in psychological research)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in scientific method)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important to science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important technique in psychological research)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important for scientists)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(observation, be needed in research)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(observation, relate to scientific method)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(practice, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(experiment, be important in science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(observation, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(practice, be important in science)