observation: be different from subjective observations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.61
Siblings experiment
Weight: 0.65
, outlier
Weight: 0.53
, hipparchus
Weight: 0.33
, evaluation
Weight: 0.33
, telescope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from subjective observations 1.00
be better than subjective observations 0.98
be different from observations 0.91
be better than observations 0.87
differ from inferences 0.81
be better than correlational studies 0.77
lead to scientific inferences 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be better than correlational studies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(experiment, be better than correlational studies)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(experiment, be better than correlational studies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(observation, be different from subjective observations)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, be better than subjective observations)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(observation, be better than subjective observations)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(observation, differ from inferences)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(observation, differ from inferences)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(observation, differ from inferences)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(observation, be better than subjective observations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(observation, differ from inferences)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(observation, lead to scientific inferences)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(observation, lead to scientific inferences)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(observation, lead to scientific inferences)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(observation, lead to scientific inferences)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(observation, be better than subjective observations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(observation, be different from subjective observations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(observation, be different from subjective observations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(observation, be different from subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(experiment, be better than correlational studies)