observation: be important in laboratory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.61
Siblings experiment
Weight: 0.65
, outlier
Weight: 0.53
, hipparchus
Weight: 0.33
, evaluation
Weight: 0.33
, telescope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in laboratory 1.00
be needed in research 0.76
be in experiments 0.76
be important in scientific method 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(outlier, be in experiments)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(outlier, be in experiments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(outlier, be in experiments)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(observation, be important in laboratory)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(observation, be needed in research)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(observation, be important in scientific method)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(observation, be needed in research)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(observation, be needed in research)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(observation, be important in scientific method)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(observation, be important in scientific method)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in scientific method)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(observation, be needed in research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in laboratory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(observation, be important in laboratory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important in laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(outlier, be in experiments)