observation: be used

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.61
Siblings experiment
Weight: 0.65
, outlier
Weight: 0.53
, hipparchus
Weight: 0.33
, evaluation
Weight: 0.33
, telescope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used 1.00
be used test 0.79
be used view 0.79
be are used on ways 0.79
be used in years 0.79
be are used on new ways 0.78
make use 0.76
be applied 0.76
be used in early years 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(instrument, be are used on new ways)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(observation, be used)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(instrument, be are used on new ways)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be are used on new ways)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be used view)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be used test)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(instrument, be are used on new ways)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(observation, be used)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(experiment, be used test)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(experiment, be used test)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(telescope, be used view)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(telescope, be used view)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(observation, be used)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(observation, be applied)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(observation, be used in early years)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(observation, be applied)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(observation, be applied)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(observation, be applied)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(observation, be used in early years)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(observation, be used in early years)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(observation, be used in early years)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(observation, be used)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(observation, be used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(instrument, be are used on new ways)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(experiment, be used test)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(telescope, be used view)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(observation, be used)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(instrument, be are used on new ways)