ocelot: is nearly extinct

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.55
, animal
Weight: 0.52
, mammal
Weight: 0.49
, wildlife
Weight: 0.44
Siblings tabby cat
Weight: 0.35
, black cat
Weight: 0.34
, siamese
Weight: 0.34
, tiger
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is nearly extinct 1.00
is extinct 0.93
become extinct 0.91
go extinct 0.91
be saved from extinction 0.77
is endangered species 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(species, become extinct)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(species, become extinct)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(species, go extinct)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(species, go extinct)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(species, become extinct)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(species, become extinct)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(species, go extinct)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(species, become extinct)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(species, become extinct)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is extinct)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tiger, become extinct)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tiger, go extinct)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(species, become extinct)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(species, become extinct)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(species, go extinct)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(tiger, go extinct)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tiger, go extinct)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tiger, become extinct)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tiger, become extinct)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tiger, is extinct)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(tiger, is extinct)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(ocelot, is nearly extinct)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ocelot, go extinct)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ocelot, is extinct)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(ocelot, become extinct)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ocelot, go extinct)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ocelot, go extinct)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ocelot, become extinct)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ocelot, become extinct)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ocelot, is extinct)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, become extinct)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, go extinct)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(ocelot, is extinct)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is extinct)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ocelot, be saved from extinction)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, be saved from extinction)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ocelot, is endangered species)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(ocelot, be saved from extinction)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ocelot, be saved from extinction)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ocelot, is endangered species)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ocelot, is endangered species)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is endangered species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, go extinct)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(species, become extinct)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(species, become extinct)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tiger, go extinct)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tiger, become extinct)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tiger, is extinct)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, go extinct)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(species, become extinct)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ocelot, is nearly extinct)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(species, become extinct)