octopus: be endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.73
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.71
, squid
Weight: 0.68
, mollusk
Weight: 0.67
Siblings giant squid
Weight: 0.38
, cephalopod
Weight: 0.37
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, whale shark
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be endangered 1.00
is endangered 1.00
species 0.78
is endagered 0.77
go extinct 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(invertebrate, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(octopus, be endangered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(invertebrate, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(giant squid, is endangered)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, be endangered)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(lizard, is endangered)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is endangered)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, go extinct)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is endagered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(invertebrate, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(octopus, be endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(giant squid, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(giant squid, is endangered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(whale shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is endangered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(whale shark, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(whale shark, be endangered)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(lizard, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lizard, is endangered)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(cephalopod, species)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, species)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(whale shark, go extinct)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(whale shark, go extinct)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(whale shark, is endagered)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is endagered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(octopus, be endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(octopus, is endangered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(octopus, is endangered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(octopus, is endangered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(octopus, is endangered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(octopus, be endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(invertebrate, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(giant squid, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cephalopod, species)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(whale shark, is endangered)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(whale shark, go extinct)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(whale shark, be endangered)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lizard, is endangered)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(whale shark, is endagered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(octopus, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(invertebrate, is endangered)