offer: get downvoted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.59
, document
Weight: 0.59
, link
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invitation
Weight: 0.60
, bid
Weight: 0.55
, yank
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.32
, recommendation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
get downvotes 1.00
get downvoted 1.00
be getting 0.89
get many downvotes 0.83
get home 0.80
get away with kinds of things 0.79
get away with kinds 0.78
go bad 0.77
have time going 0.77
have more time going 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(plan, be getting)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(plan, have more time going)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(plan, have time going)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(plan, be getting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(plan, be getting)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(plan, have time going) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(plan, have time going)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(plan, have more time going) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(plan, have more time going)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(offer, get downvoted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(offer, get downvoted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(offer, get downvoted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(plan, be getting)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(plan, have time going)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(offer, get downvoted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(plan, have more time going)