office building: have noise

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents apartment building
Weight: 0.75
, construction
Weight: 0.73
, facility
Weight: 0.71
, office
Weight: 0.63
Siblings empire state building
Weight: 0.78
, shopping center
Weight: 0.71
, hotel
Weight: 0.66
, white house
Weight: 0.64
, warehouse
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have noise 1.00
use noise 0.97
have white noise 0.95
play noise 0.95
use white noise 0.93
play white noise 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(office, have white noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(office building, have noise)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(office, use white noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(office building, have noise)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(office, play white noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(office building, have noise)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(office, play white noise)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(office, use white noise)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(office, have white noise)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(office, play white noise)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(office, have white noise)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(office, use white noise)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(office, have white noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(office building, have noise)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(office, use white noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(office building, have noise)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(office, play white noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(office building, have noise)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(office building, have noise)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(office building, have white noise)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(office building, have white noise)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(office building, have white noise)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(office building, have white noise)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(office building, have noise)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(office building, have noise)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(office, play white noise)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(office, use white noise)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(office, have white noise)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(office, play white noise)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(office, use white noise)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(office building, have noise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(office, have white noise)