office: have lights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents office building
Weight: 0.80
, warehouse
Weight: 0.66
, space
Weight: 0.63
, house
Weight: 0.63
Siblings post office
Weight: 0.79
, dental office
Weight: 0.75
, doctor office
Weight: 0.74
, home office
Weight: 0.73
, branch
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
have lights 1.00
use lights 0.97
leave on lights 0.92
have fluorescent lights 0.89
keep lights on on night 0.88
use fluorescent lights 0.87
keep lights at at night 0.87
leave lights at at night 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(office building, leave on lights)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(office, have lights)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(office building, leave on lights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(office building, leave on lights)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(office building, leave on lights)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(office, have lights)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(office, have lights)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(office, use lights)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(office, use lights)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(office, leave lights at at night)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(office, leave lights at at night)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(office, use lights)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(office, leave lights at at night)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(office, keep lights at at night)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(office, keep lights at at night)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(office, keep lights at at night)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(office, use lights)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(office, leave on lights)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(office, keep lights on on night)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(office, leave on lights)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(office, keep lights on on night)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(office, leave lights at at night)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(office, keep lights at at night)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(office, keep lights on on night)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(office, leave on lights)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(office, leave on lights)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(office, keep lights on on night)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(office, use fluorescent lights)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(office, use fluorescent lights)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(office, have fluorescent lights)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(office, use fluorescent lights)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(office, use fluorescent lights)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(office, have fluorescent lights)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(office, have fluorescent lights)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(office, have fluorescent lights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(office, have lights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(office, have lights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(office building, leave on lights)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(office, have lights)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(office building, leave on lights)