officer: be in house

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.68
, other person
Weight: 0.63
, official
Weight: 0.63
Siblings warrant officer
Weight: 0.77
, vice president
Weight: 0.74
, executive
Weight: 0.72
, chairman
Weight: 0.71
, inspector
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in house 1.00
live in house 0.93
live in white house 0.89
be in house chosen 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(vice president, live in house)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(vice president, live in white house)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(vice president, live in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(vice president, live in house)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(vice president, live in white house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(vice president, live in white house)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(officer, be in house)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(officer, be in house chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in house chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(officer, be in house chosen)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(officer, be in house chosen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in house)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(officer, be in house)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(vice president, live in house)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(vice president, live in white house)