officer: is military

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.68
, other person
Weight: 0.63
, official
Weight: 0.63
Siblings warrant officer
Weight: 0.77
, vice president
Weight: 0.74
, executive
Weight: 0.72
, chairman
Weight: 0.71
, inspector
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
is military 1.00
be in military 0.99
leave military 0.92
be in the miltary 0.84
leave army 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(official, be in military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(officer, is military)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(official, be in military)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(official, be in military)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(official, be in military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(officer, is military)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(officer, is military)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(officer, leave military)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(officer, leave military)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(officer, be in military)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in military)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(officer, leave military)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(officer, leave army)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(officer, be in military)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(officer, leave army)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(officer, be in the miltary)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(officer, leave army)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(officer, leave military)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(officer, be in military)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in the miltary)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(officer, be in the miltary)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(officer, leave army)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(officer, be in the miltary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(officer, is military)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(officer, is military)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(official, be in military)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(officer, is military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(official, be in military)