oh: is good nucleophile

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.66
, word
Weight: 0.63
, expression
Weight: 0.59
, tune
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hey
Weight: 0.37
, f word
Weight: 0.36
, jesus christ
Weight: 0.35
, think
Weight: 0.35
, shit
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good nucleophile 1.00
has quality good 0.87
has quality bad 0.83
is strong 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expression, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(oh, is good nucleophile)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(oh, is good nucleophile)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expression, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(expression, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(shit, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(f word, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jesus christ, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expression, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(oh, is good nucleophile)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(oh, is good nucleophile)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jesus christ, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(jesus christ, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(shit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(shit, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(f word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(f word, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(oh, is good nucleophile)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(oh, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(oh, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(oh, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(oh, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(oh, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(oh, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(oh, is strong)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(oh, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(oh, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(oh, is strong)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(oh, is strong)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(oh, is strong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(oh, is good nucleophile)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expression, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shit, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(f word, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(jesus christ, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expression, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(oh, is good nucleophile)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)