ohio: be better than michigan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than michigan 1.00
be called ohio 0.82
be far from oregon 0.81
be named ohio 0.81
was named ohio 0.80
be different from pennsylvania 0.78
have 2 nfl teams 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(ohio, be better than michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ohio, be called ohio)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ohio, be far from oregon)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(ohio, was named ohio)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(ohio, be named ohio)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called ohio)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be far from oregon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be named ohio)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(ohio, be far from oregon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ohio, be far from oregon)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be different from pennsylvania)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(ohio, was named ohio)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called ohio)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(ohio, be called ohio)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have 2 nfl teams)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ohio, be named ohio)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ohio, be named ohio)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(ohio, be different from pennsylvania)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ohio, was named ohio)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(ohio, was named ohio)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ohio, be different from pennsylvania)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(ohio, be different from pennsylvania)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ohio, have 2 nfl teams)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ohio, have 2 nfl teams)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, have 2 nfl teams)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be better than michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(ohio, be better than michigan)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be better than michigan)