ohio: be called state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called state 1.00
is bad state 0.82
was chosen state 0.79
is red state 0.78
is best state 0.77
was called gate way state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(florida, is red state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(iowa, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(iowa, be called state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(florida, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(florida, is red state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(iowa, is best state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(ohio, be called state)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ohio, is bad state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ohio, was chosen state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ohio, was called gate way state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ohio, is red state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ohio, is red state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ohio, was chosen state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(ohio, was called gate way state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(ohio, was chosen state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ohio, is best state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ohio, is red state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(ohio, was called gate way state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ohio, was chosen state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ohio, was called gate way state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(iowa, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(florida, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iowa, is best state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state)