ohio: have many electoral votes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
have many electoral votes 1.00
get many electoral votes 1.00
have electoral votes 0.99
have 18 electoral votes 0.99
get electoral votes 0.98
have many electorial votes 0.93
have electorial votes 0.92
have election 0.87
has state election 0.85
need election 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(illinois, have electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ohio, have many electoral votes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(illinois, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ohio, have many electoral votes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(illinois, have many electoral votes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illinois, have electoral votes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have many electoral votes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have electoral votes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(florida, have many electoral votes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(illinois, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ohio, have many electoral votes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(illinois, have electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ohio, have many electoral votes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(florida, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(florida, have many electoral votes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ohio, have many electoral votes)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(ohio, have 18 electoral votes)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ohio, have electoral votes)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have 18 electoral votes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ohio, have electoral votes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(ohio, have 18 electoral votes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ohio, have electoral votes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ohio, have 18 electoral votes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ohio, have election)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ohio, has state election)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have electoral votes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ohio, have election)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ohio, have election)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ohio, has state election)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ohio, has state election)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ohio, has state election)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have election)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ohio, have many electoral votes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(illinois, have many electoral votes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(illinois, have electoral votes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(florida, have many electoral votes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(illinois, have many electoral votes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ohio, have many electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(illinois, have electoral votes)