oil: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents natural gas
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.65
, fuel
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.61
, raw material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings castor oil
Weight: 0.83
, motor oil
Weight: 0.80
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.70
, castor
Weight: 0.41
, olive oil
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
affect climate 0.78
be bad for earth 0.78
be bad for human health 0.78
affect climate change 0.78
be associated with climate change 0.77
is good thing 0.77
contribute to climate change 0.77
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fuel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(natural gas, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oil, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(olive oil, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(castor oil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(castor oil, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(natural gas, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fuel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(olive oil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(olive oil, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(castor oil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(castor oil, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(castor oil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(castor oil, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(oil, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(oil, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(oil, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(oil, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(oil, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(oil, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(oil, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oil, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(olive oil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(castor oil, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(castor oil, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality good)