oil: be good for frying

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents natural gas
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.65
, fuel
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.61
, raw material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings castor oil
Weight: 0.83
, motor oil
Weight: 0.80
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.70
, castor
Weight: 0.41
, olive oil
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for frying 1.00
be required for frying 0.94
be required for deep frying 0.91
keep food sticking to frying pan 0.88
be bad for cooking 0.83
used for cooking 0.80
be used in cooking 0.80
be used in baking 0.79
be added for cooking pasta 0.78
cook with with water 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(vegetable oil, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(oil, be good for frying)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, be used in baking)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, be used in baking)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(olive oil, be good for frying)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(olive oil, be bad for cooking)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(olive oil, be used in cooking)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(vegetable oil, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(oil, be good for frying)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(olive oil, be used in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(olive oil, be used in cooking)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(olive oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(olive oil, be good for frying)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(olive oil, be bad for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(olive oil, be bad for cooking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(oil, be good for frying)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(oil, be required for deep frying)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(oil, be required for deep frying)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(oil, be required for deep frying)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(oil, be used in cooking)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(oil, be used in cooking)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for cooking)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(oil, be used in cooking)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(oil, used for cooking)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(oil, used for cooking)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(oil, be bad for cooking)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(oil, used for cooking)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(oil, be bad for cooking)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oil, used for cooking)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(oil, be bad for cooking)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oil, be used in cooking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(oil, be good for frying)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(oil, be good for frying)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, be used in baking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(olive oil, be good for frying)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(olive oil, be bad for cooking)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(olive oil, be used in cooking)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(oil, be good for frying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, be used in baking)