oil: be required for deep frying

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents natural gas
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.65
, fuel
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.61
, raw material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings castor oil
Weight: 0.83
, motor oil
Weight: 0.80
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.70
, castor
Weight: 0.41
, olive oil
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be required for deep frying 1.00
be required for frying 0.95
be good for frying 0.91
keep food sticking to frying pan 0.83
cook with with water 0.78
used for cooking 0.77
be used in cooking 0.77
be bad for cooking 0.76
be used in baking 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(vegetable oil, be used in baking)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(oil, be required for deep frying)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, be used in baking)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, be used in baking)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(olive oil, be good for frying)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(olive oil, be bad for cooking)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(olive oil, be used in cooking)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(vegetable oil, be used in baking)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(oil, be required for deep frying)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(olive oil, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(olive oil, be used in cooking)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(olive oil, be good for frying)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(olive oil, be good for frying)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(olive oil, be bad for cooking)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(olive oil, be bad for cooking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(oil, be required for deep frying)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(oil, be good for frying)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(oil, be good for frying)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(oil, be good for frying)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(oil, be good for frying)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(oil, be used in cooking)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(oil, be used in cooking)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(oil, be used in cooking)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(oil, used for cooking)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(oil, used for cooking)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for cooking)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(oil, used for cooking)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(oil, be bad for cooking)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oil, used for cooking)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(oil, be bad for cooking)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oil, be used in cooking)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(oil, be bad for cooking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(oil, be required for deep frying)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, be used in baking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(olive oil, be good for frying)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(olive oil, be used in cooking)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(olive oil, be bad for cooking)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(oil, be required for deep frying)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, be used in baking)