oklahoma: have tolls

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kansas
Weight: 0.63
, school
Weight: 0.60
, north america
Weight: 0.60
, louisiana
Weight: 0.58
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tolls 1.00
have toll roads 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(kansas, have toll roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have tolls)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(kansas, have toll roads)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(kansas, have toll roads)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(kansas, have toll roads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have tolls)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(oklahoma, have tolls)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have toll roads)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have toll roads)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have toll roads)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(oklahoma, have toll roads)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have tolls)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have tolls)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(kansas, have toll roads)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(oklahoma, have tolls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(kansas, have toll roads)