old person: have big ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.67
, child
Weight: 0.53
, case
Weight: 0.50
Siblings one person
Weight: 0.40
, elderly person
Weight: 0.39
, dead person
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big ears 1.00
has physical part ears 0.89
have big nose 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(elderly person, has physical part ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(elderly person, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(elderly person, has physical part ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(old person, have big ears)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(old person, has physical part ears)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(old person, has physical part ears)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(old person, has physical part ears)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(old person, have big nose)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(old person, have big nose)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(old person, have big nose)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(old person, have big nose)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(old person, has physical part ears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(old person, have big ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(old person, have big ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(old person, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(elderly person, has physical part ears)