old person: need glass

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.67
, child
Weight: 0.53
, case
Weight: 0.50
Siblings other person
Weight: 0.39
, elderly person
Weight: 0.39
, dead person
Weight: 0.39
, young person
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
need glass 1.00
need glass to read 0.94
wear glass 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(elderly person, need glass)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(elderly person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(elderly person, need glass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(old person, need glass)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(old person, need glass to read)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(old person, wear glass)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(old person, need glass to read)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(old person, need glass to read)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(old person, need glass to read)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(old person, wear glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(old person, wear glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(old person, wear glass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(old person, need glass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(old person, need glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(old person, need glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(elderly person, need glass)