older people: be typically bad with technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young people
Weight: 0.79
, most people
Weight: 0.70
, many people
Weight: 0.65
, other people
Weight: 0.64
Siblings poor people
Weight: 0.37
, young woman
Weight: 0.37
, business people
Weight: 0.37
, young man
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be typically bad with technology 1.00
be bad with technology 0.90
hate new technology 0.82
suck with technology 0.81
struggle with technology 0.78
become more tech savvy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(older people, be typically bad with technology)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(older people, be bad with technology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(older people, be bad with technology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(older people, be bad with technology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(older people, struggle with technology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(older people, suck with technology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(older people, be bad with technology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(older people, struggle with technology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(older people, suck with technology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(older people, become more tech savvy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(older people, struggle with technology)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(older people, suck with technology)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(older people, become more tech savvy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(older people, suck with technology)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(older people, become more tech savvy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(older people, become more tech savvy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(older people, struggle with technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(older people, be typically bad with technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(older people, be typically bad with technology)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(older people, be typically bad with technology)