oligopoly: is market

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.52
, competition
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.33
, firm
Weight: 0.28
, monopoly
Weight: 0.24
Siblings banking industry
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.30
, petroleum
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is market 1.00
is market structure 0.86
is market failure 0.84
is common market structure 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(monopoly, is market failure)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(oligopoly, is market)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(competition, is market structure)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(oligopoly, is market)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(competition, is market structure)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is market failure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is market failure)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(competition, is market structure)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(competition, is market structure)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, is market)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(monopoly, is market failure)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, is market)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(oligopoly, is market)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oligopoly, is market structure)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(oligopoly, is common market structure)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, is market structure)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, is market structure)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(oligopoly, is market failure)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, is market failure)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, is common market structure)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, is common market structure)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(oligopoly, is market structure)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, is market failure)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(oligopoly, is common market structure)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(oligopoly, is market failure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, is market)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(oligopoly, is market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(competition, is market structure)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(monopoly, is market failure)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(competition, is market structure)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(oligopoly, is market)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(monopoly, is market failure)