onion ring: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.64
, vegetable
Weight: 0.62
, sandwich
Weight: 0.61
, fast food
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sweet potato
Weight: 0.69
, batter
Weight: 0.44
, onion
Weight: 0.38
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.36
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality joke 0.79
be healthy for us 0.75
be good for heart 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(onion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(onion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(onion, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(onion ring, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(onion ring, has quality joke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality joke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(onion ring, has quality joke)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality joke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(onion, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(onion ring, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)