ontario: be named ontario

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents province
Weight: 0.66
, toronto
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.56
, region
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alberta
Weight: 0.37
, quebec
Weight: 0.35
, ottawa
Weight: 0.34
, montreal
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be named ontario 1.00
be named rizal 0.77
get named 0.76
be called toronto good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(province, be named rizal)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ontario, be named ontario)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ontario, be named ontario)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(province, be named rizal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(province, be named rizal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(province, be named rizal)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(ontario, be named ontario)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(ontario, be named ontario)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ontario, be named ontario)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ontario, be named ontario)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ontario, be named ontario)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(province, be named rizal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(province, be named rizal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(ontario, be named ontario)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)