ontario: have budget problem

Related concepts

Parents	province Weight: 0.66 , toronto Weight: 0.56 , place Weight: 0.56 , region Weight: 0.55
Siblings	alberta Weight: 0.37 , quebec Weight: 0.35 , ottawa Weight: 0.34 , montreal Weight: 0.34 , quebec city Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have budget problem	1.00
solve problem of lack of resources	0.77
solve problem	0.76
solve problem of lack	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(region, solve problem of lack) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(ontario, have budget problem)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(region, solve problem of lack of resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(ontario, have budget problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(region, solve problem of lack of resources)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(region, solve problem of lack)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(region, solve problem of lack of resources)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(region, solve problem of lack)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(region, solve problem of lack) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(ontario, have budget problem)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(region, solve problem of lack of resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(ontario, have budget problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(ontario, have budget problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(ontario, have budget problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(ontario, have budget problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(region, solve problem of lack of resources)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(region, solve problem of lack)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(region, solve problem of lack of resources)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(ontario, have budget problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(region, solve problem of lack)