ontology: be important to research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.59
, knowledge
Weight: 0.58
, structure
Weight: 0.52
, language
Weight: 0.50
, approach
Weight: 0.50
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.33
, synthesis
Weight: 0.33
, social engineering
Weight: 0.32
, architecture
Weight: 0.32
, programming language
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to research 1.00
be important in research 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ontology, be important to research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ontology, be important to research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(synthesis, be important in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ontology, be important to research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ontology, be important to research)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ontology, be important to research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ontology, be important in research)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(ontology, be important to research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ontology, be important in research)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ontology, be important to research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ontology, be important in research)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ontology, be important to research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ontology, be important in research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ontology, be important to research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ontology, be important to research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ontology, be important to research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ontology, be important to research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ontology, be important to research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ontology, be important to research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(synthesis, be important in research)