op: be stupid liar dog

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.58
, time
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, work
Weight: 0.51
Siblings implant
Weight: 0.32
, vacuum tube
Weight: 0.31
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.31
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stupid liar dog 1.00
be stupid liar probably dog 0.98
is bad guy 0.79
is guy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(op, be stupid liar dog)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(op, be stupid liar probably dog)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(op, be stupid liar probably dog)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(op, be stupid liar probably dog)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(op, be stupid liar probably dog)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(op, is guy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(op, is bad guy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(op, is guy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(op, is bad guy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(op, is guy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(op, is bad guy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(op, is bad guy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(op, is guy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(op, be stupid liar dog)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(op, be stupid liar dog)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(op, be stupid liar dog)