openness: be important in research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents principle
Weight: 0.62
, virtue
Weight: 0.62
, value
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings transparency
Weight: 0.37
, honesty
Weight: 0.35
, fairness
Weight: 0.35
, freedom
Weight: 0.34
, compassion
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in research 1.00
is important to study 0.87
be important in science 0.82
be important with scientists 0.79
be important to scientists 0.79
be important in work 0.79
be important in field of science 0.78
be important at work 0.78
be important trait for scientists 0.77
be important in scientist 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(characteristic, be important in field of science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(openness, be important in research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(characteristic, be important in field of science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be important in field of science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important in research)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(transparency, be important in research)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important in science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important with scientists)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important to scientists)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important in scientist)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important at work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important trait for scientists)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(characteristic, be important in field of science)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(openness, be important in research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(transparency, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(transparency, be important in research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(honesty, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important in research)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(honesty, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important in science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(honesty, be important to scientists)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important to scientists)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(honesty, be important with scientists)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important with scientists)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(honesty, be important at work)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important at work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(honesty, be important trait for scientists)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important trait for scientists)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(honesty, be important in scientist)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important in scientist)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(openness, be important in research)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(openness, be important in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(openness, be important in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(openness, be important in science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(openness, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(characteristic, be important in field of science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(honesty, be important in research)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(transparency, be important in research)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(honesty, be important in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(honesty, be important with scientists)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(honesty, be important at work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(honesty, be important to scientists)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(honesty, be important trait for scientists)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(honesty, be important in scientist)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(openness, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(characteristic, be important in field of science)