opera: be considered high art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents classical music
Weight: 0.64
, web browser
Weight: 0.62
, art
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.59
Siblings norma
Weight: 0.38
, symphony
Weight: 0.36
, ballet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered high art 1.00
be considered art 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(art, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(opera, be considered high art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(art, be considered art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(art, be considered art)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(art, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(opera, be considered high art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(opera, be considered high art)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(opera, be considered art)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(opera, be considered art)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(opera, be considered art)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(opera, be considered art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(opera, be considered high art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(opera, be considered high art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(art, be considered art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(opera, be considered high art)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(art, be considered art)