operating system: be called systems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer program
Weight: 0.73
, operation
Weight: 0.73
, solution
Weight: 0.70
, function
Weight: 0.66
, free software
Weight: 0.66
Siblings system
Weight: 0.37
, central processing unit
Weight: 0.36
, nervous system
Weight: 0.35
, central nervous system
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called systems 1.00
be called operating systems 0.87
be needed in computer system 0.81
be necessary for computer system 0.81
be described as software 0.76
of protection to system 0.76
need security mechanisms 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(system, be called operating systems)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, of protection to system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(system, be called operating systems)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(system, be called operating systems)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(system, of protection to system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(operating system, be called systems)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(operating system, be called operating systems)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called operating systems)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be needed in computer system)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be necessary for computer system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(operating system, of protection to system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be described as software)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(operating system, be called operating systems)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(operating system, need security mechanisms)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(operating system, be described as software)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(operating system, need security mechanisms)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(operating system, be called operating systems)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(operating system, be needed in computer system)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(operating system, need security mechanisms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(operating system, be described as software)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(operating system, need security mechanisms)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(operating system, be needed in computer system)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(operating system, be described as software)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(operating system, be needed in computer system)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(operating system, be necessary for computer system)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(operating system, be necessary for computer system)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(operating system, be necessary for computer system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(operating system, of protection to system)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(operating system, of protection to system)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(operating system, of protection to system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(operating system, be called systems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(system, of protection to system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(system, be called operating systems)