opinion: be important in system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents recommendation
Weight: 0.70
, report
Weight: 0.66
, view
Weight: 0.64
, expression
Weight: 0.62
Siblings opposition
Weight: 0.59
, verdict
Weight: 0.56
, conjecture
Weight: 0.54
, accord
Weight: 0.54
, number one
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in system 1.00
be important in judicial system 0.81
be important in project management process 0.78
be important in database 0.77
be key element in democracy 0.76
be important in business 0.76
be important to management 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(opinion, be important in system)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(report, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(opinion, be important in system)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(opinion, be important in system)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(opinion, be important in system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(report, be important in database)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(report, be important to management)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(report, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in business)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in database)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(opinion, be important in system)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(opinion, be important in system)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(report, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(opinion, be important in system)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(opinion, be important in system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(opinion, be important in system)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in judicial system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be key element in democracy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(opinion, be important in judicial system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(opinion, be key element in democracy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(opinion, be important in judicial system)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(opinion, be important in judicial system)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(opinion, be key element in democracy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(opinion, be key element in democracy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(opinion, be important in system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important in database)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(report, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important in database)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(report, be important in business)