opportunity: knock students ' perceptions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents privilege
Weight: 0.65
, example
Weight: 0.64
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings moment
Weight: 0.65
, challenge
Weight: 0.65
, avenue
Weight: 0.64
, advantage
Weight: 0.64
, happy hour
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
knock low-income students ' perceptions 1.00
knock students ' perceptions 1.00
be important for positive customer perception 0.77
be important for customer perception 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(moment, be important for positive customer perception)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(moment, be important for customer perception)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(moment, be important for positive customer perception)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(moment, be important for positive customer perception)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(moment, be important for customer perception)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(moment, be important for customer perception)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, knock low-income students ' perceptions)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(opportunity, knock low-income students ' perceptions)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(opportunity, knock low-income students ' perceptions)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(opportunity, knock low-income students ' perceptions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(moment, be important for positive customer perception)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, knock students ' perceptions)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(moment, be important for customer perception)