opposition: be to immigration controversial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.60
, opinion
Weight: 0.59
, policy
Weight: 0.58
, legislation
Weight: 0.56
Siblings conservative
Weight: 0.57
, conservative party
Weight: 0.55
, coup
Weight: 0.49
, nationalist
Weight: 0.48
, socialist party
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to immigration controversial 1.00
be to illegal immigration controversial 0.97
be to immigration 0.94
be to illegal immigration 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(opposition, be to immigration controversial)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(opposition, be to immigration)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(opposition, be to immigration)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(opposition, be to immigration)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(opposition, be to illegal immigration)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(opposition, be to illegal immigration)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(opposition, be to illegal immigration)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(opposition, be to illegal immigration)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(opposition, be to illegal immigration controversial)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(opposition, be to illegal immigration controversial)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(opposition, be to illegal immigration controversial)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(opposition, be to illegal immigration controversial)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(opposition, be to immigration)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(opposition, be to immigration controversial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(opposition, be to immigration controversial)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(opposition, be to immigration controversial)