ops: be popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents point
Weight: 0.16
Siblings miami
Weight: 0.18
, node
Weight: 0.17
, capcom
Weight: 0.17
, correction
Weight: 0.17
, control tower
Weight: 0.17

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular 1.00
is popular 0.99
is famous 0.77
be such favorite to 3-peat 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(miami, be such favorite to 3-peat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(node, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(miami, is famous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(node, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(node, is popular)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(miami, be such favorite to 3-peat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(miami, be such favorite to 3-peat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(miami, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(miami, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ops, be popular)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ops, is popular)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ops, is popular)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ops, is popular)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ops, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ops, be popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ops, be popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(miami, be such favorite to 3-peat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(node, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ops, be popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(miami, is famous)