optic nerve: has quality spot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nerve
Weight: 0.81
, spinal cord
Weight: 0.71
, nerve fiber
Weight: 0.68
, tissue
Weight: 0.63
, nervous system
Weight: 0.63
Siblings sciatic nerve
Weight: 0.42
, olfactory nerve
Weight: 0.39
, cerebral cortex
Weight: 0.35
, cerebral palsy
Weight: 0.35
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality spot 1.00
cause spot 0.87
is blind spot 0.82
cause blind spot 0.80
is quality 0.79
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerve fiber, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(nervous system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nerve, cause blind spot)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nerve fiber, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(nerve fiber, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(nerve, cause blind spot)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(nerve fiber, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(nerve, cause blind spot)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(nerve fiber, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(nerve fiber, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tissue, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerve fiber, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(nervous system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nerve, cause blind spot)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nerve fiber, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(optic nerve, has quality spot)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, is blind spot)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(optic nerve, is blind spot)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(optic nerve, is blind spot)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, cause blind spot)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(optic nerve, cause blind spot)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(optic nerve, is blind spot)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(optic nerve, cause blind spot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(optic nerve, cause spot)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, cause spot)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(optic nerve, cause blind spot)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(optic nerve, cause spot)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(optic nerve, cause spot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nerve, cause blind spot)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nerve fiber, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(nerve fiber, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nerve, cause blind spot)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nerve fiber, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(nerve fiber, has quality good)