optical fiber: be better than copper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fiber
Weight: 0.76
, substrate
Weight: 0.72
, light source
Weight: 0.66
, structure
Weight: 0.65
Siblings amplifier
Weight: 0.64
, silicon
Weight: 0.36
, nylon
Weight: 0.35
, polymer
Weight: 0.35
, filament
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than copper 1.00
be much faster than copper 0.95
be preferred over copper wires 0.84
is optic cable better than copper cable 0.83
be more ductile than metals 0.82
be preferred over copper wires for communication 0.82
be more elastic than metals 0.80
is zinc 0.80
be better than germanium 0.79
be softer than diamond 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(light source, is zinc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(light source, is zinc)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fiber, be better than copper)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(light source, is zinc)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(polymer, be more ductile than metals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(polymer, be more elastic than metals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(light source, is zinc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(polymer, be more elastic than metals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(polymer, be more elastic than metals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(polymer, be more ductile than metals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(polymer, be more ductile than metals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be better than copper)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiber, be better than copper)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(light source, is zinc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(polymer, be more ductile than metals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(polymer, be more elastic than metals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiber, be better than copper)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(light source, is zinc)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)